Pondering about future generations...

Why am I seeing this, when will it end? Will it ever end?
Who made it right to discard a young ones roots, culture or identity. When did it become acceptable to bully, harass, psychologically and emotionally break and destroy people within their own homes.
When did it become standard procedure to lie and fabricate untruths in order to remove a child from their stable loving home and family?

What's more, why is it in the best interest of local authorities to remove these children, traffick and sell them. Why is there such a huge demand for foster carers and why are there uk wide recruitment drives on social media platfroms?

I have so many questions and have tried to find an honest answer, in truth I cant!
I've tried to understand the legalities of it, but can't distinguish much of it, that's due to so many children being removed due to recommendations because strangers in their ultimate personal opinion believe a child to be at some kind of future risk of harm. There rarely if at all seems to be a process  of elimination, common sense or logic. Truth is, everybody is at risk of future harm in some form on a daily basis. Doesn't mean we all get harmed, does it?

From where I've been perched it seems the risk of harm to many of the 90k children in the care of the local authority is from being in the 'care' of the local authority.
It's being proven that the parenting and/or guardianship of the local authority is a future risk of harm to the children and young people. Mainly because they can't meet their own personal needs, something the parent/s has been giving since births, tailor made not out of a book or personal opinion but what works for the individual child or young person. Are we as humans not all unique, what some enjoy could kill others. For example an Ice Cream, for some people Ice Cream can be deadly. What about the poor innocent peanut, that's a future risk of harm to some of us humans, is it not?

The reason I believe the above to be true is mainly down to one dominating factor, that factor being, that many children are removed from their loving safe and caring family homes because the parent/s  themselves were unfortunate enough to have suffered some form of abuse and/or have been in the care of the local authority, which the 'professionals' more often than not see as a risk to their own children. That goes for those who got through the 'care system' with no other real traumas, not that I'm saying being in the care system isn't traumatic, of course it is! Alienated form your own family through no fault of your own or theirs.

The moment a child or young person goes into care they are labelled and treated as second class children/citizens. Easy pickings for abusers, exploiters and traffickers, easier because the child or young person is already a second class kid, who is going to believe them? Who do they trust to tell if something is wrong? The social worker? Why would they do that, the social worker is the enemy, they put them where they are, they took them from the safety of their own family home into a web of unstable placements. Why would they trust to tell them anything?
They already told them that they were safe at home that their parent/s loved and cared for them, that the professionals opinion of abuse/risk of harm are untrue!.
But it's seldom these little/young people are believed. You see and understand young people in care are NOT believed by looking into scandals such as Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford to name but a few.

In short MANY of the victims made by the local authority because of their poor standard of 'care' 'guardianship' and 'neglectful' parenting is used against the victim/statistic that they themselves created due to leaving the young person/s at a constant 'future risk of harm'.
Often resulting in the young person/s suffering some kind of trauma, exploitation, rape or abuse.

 Inevitably any one of the former, no matter how mild or horrific will undoubtedly create some form of mental health problems. Very few victims of trauma survive the event with out suffering mentally, emotionally and psysically. That in mind not everybody goes to the extreme level of mental health and/or emotional problems.

That said local authorities use their serious lack of care and neglect against the victims of rape which in some cases allow the perpetrator to have sole custody and the victim with limited if any contact.
The vision these 'professionals' get through their crystal ball is nothing more than the reflection of what their former colleagues caused the person/s in general. It's a generation to late to predict the future, the prediction is already there staring back at you.

There is popular belief within the social and health care profession that those who have the misfortune of being groomed, exploited, suffered mental, emotional, physical or sexual abuse are highly likely to abuse their own children in one way or another. Of course there are no official statistics or studies that actually prove this, just theory.
Of course I am in absolutely no doubt that a small percentage of those who were abused will go on to abuse. It would be stupid of me to assume or try and justify any other opinion.

So is it right to assume, the same 'professors' 'professionals' who believe the abused become the abuser also strongly believe those whom have been stabbed will go on to stab another, those who were administered with Rohypnol on a night out would go on to administer another with Rohypnol, a car jacking victim to become the jacker, someone who was pushed in front of a moving vehicle would push another? Someone who gets abducted will become the abductor? The raped become the rapist, the mugged become the mugger?

 This theory must, if true be no different across the board of any situation where somebody becomes a victim, if not why not? what makes it 'evidential' that those who were treated in a neglectful way by a local authority would become neglectful to their own children, the abused become the abuser what actual evidence, fact or statistics are there to even remotely confirm this?
All i see is it being a useful tool for 'professionals' to use against
 all those who have been failed victims of the system in order to abuse, control and destroy all over again based on opinion and not evidence. Similar to the family court which is run more on recommendations than legalities!

There is simply no rhyme nor reason to the barbaric practice of the majority with in the social care sector. Its of my opinion if the public saw these 'professionals' in action they would demand both disciplinary but more so a psychological assessment based on a future risk of harm to those unfortunate to be disgraced by their presence


I apologise for rambling, but thank you for reading.
More blogs will surely follow!